Well, I wanted to see unit production split from infrastructure production so that even the guy focusing on infrastructure would have a sizable army, and the guy focusing on military power would still be able to build infrastructure. Looking forward to this, probably too much causing me to go "WTF" once it's published. And with Civ 4 BtS introducing us a balanced, but usable version of Slavery and overall, a rather functional Civic-system here's hoping we don't go backwards from there. human military gets enough work in border skirmishes and against barbarians as it stands). That was such a welcome change in Civ 4 infinite expansion has drawbacks and is mostly unprofitable! But yeah, some manner of balance between economic and war-game would be really nice (like viable defense with smaller army a game like Civ should definitely lean towards economic as if it's too easy to end early, most of the game content will never see play in human vs. Oh, and I hope to gawd they don't do anything that re-enables ICS. Here's also hoping they find a balance between "you can use opponent's roads" and "you can't use opponent's roads" like "you move at half speed on opponent's territory due to resistance from the smallfolk and difficulty of supply" or something of the sort. And Forts were practically useless on all but tightest maps, especially since you couldn't protect resources with them (efficiently), and opponent couldn't use your roads anyways so you didn't really need it for that. Civ 4 was all attacker's (or rather, pillager's) market. Well, until modern era anyways where Howitzers, Stealths & Helicopters blew the bank. Civ 4 was probably the blandest Civ combat-wise hell, I'm inclined to say Civ 2 was the most successful Civ in that regard simply 'cause Zones of Control made defensive combat (and forts overseeing passages and such) doable, and artillery wasn't very good on the defensive.
Oh, and I hope to gawd they pull combat off this time. Now, if they only leave Religion in the game.
0 kommentar(er)
